State of maryland judiciary jobs4/30/2023 ![]() ![]() The brief provided history on the longstanding principle of judicial transparency and how it translates to the digital age. An amicus brief drafted by the PJC’s Appellate Advocacy Fellow Michael Abrams, and co-signed by the Clinical Law Program at the University of Maryland School of Law, the Civil Advocacy Clinic and the Legal Data & Design Clinic at the University of Baltimore School of Law, BALT, Common Cause Maryland, and the MDDC Press Association, called for the Court of Appeals to affirm the Court of Special Appeals’ decision. The Maryland Judiciary’s public records access website, CaseSearch, used an alphanumeric code to identify the judges in Baltimore City District Court records. Although an “Edit Table” for decrypting the codes existed, it was not publicly available, so the judges’ identities were obscured in online public records. The Abell Foundation sued the courts, seeking access to the Edit Table. The Court of Special Appeals held that the Table did have to be disclosed, and the AOC appealed to the Court of Appeals. Abell Foundation calls for greater transparency in our court system, requiring the Administrative Office of the Courts to disclose the key to the codes it uses to identify judges in Baltimore City District Court records. The Court of Appeals’ ruling in Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) v. Amicus briefs written by PJC Murnaghan Fellows Dena Robinson, Olivia Sedwick, and Michael Abrams and joined by the Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers’ Association focused on the broader context of wage theft, explaining to the Court how the practice in this case was an example of that widespread problem, which disproportionately burdens people of color, women, and immigrants.Īt the Court of Appeals, the central question was whether the federal “Portal to Portal Act” (PPA) – which applies to the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and states that travel time is not “work” – constrains these Maryland statutes. In a strong, undivided opinion, the Court made clear that “what constitutes ‘work’ under Maryland law is not limited to what is compensable work under the PPA and FLSA.” The ruling is a great outcome for workers and sets precedent for future cases that may turn on Maryland law giving broader protection than federal law. concerned the construction of the MGM National Harbor Resort and Casino, where the construction contractors required their workers (many of whom are Latine) to ride a shuttle a couple of miles from a parking lot to the construction site, but provided inadequate transport, so the workers often spent hours per day waiting for and riding the shuttle. The contractors refused to compensate the workers for that time, and the workers sued under Maryland’s wage statutes, arguing that this compulsory travel time was “work” under Maryland law. In an important victory in the fight against wage theft, the Court of Appeals ruled that employers must compensate employees for required travel time. Read on to hear about victories concerning employers’ responsibility to pay employees for travel time and court transparency, and mixed results in cases affecting the enforcement of rental licensing laws. As the Court’s current term comes to a close, the Court has issued several opinions in cases in which the Public Justice Center’s Appellate Advocacy Project submitted briefs. Join our team and become a valued member of a professional and skilled workforce, and enjoy benefits such as ongoing training, skills development, tuition reimbursement, and other opportunities for learning and growth.Decisions from the Court of Appeals have wide-ranging impact on Marylanders’ lives, affecting everything from workers’ rights to safe and healthy housing to the way our judicial system operates. Make a positive difference in the lives of the people in our communities by providing the highest level of service to all who come to Maryland's courts. If you are motivated and committed to providing fair, efficient and effective justice for all, the Maryland Judiciary has a career for you!Įnjoy a comprehensive and generous benefits package, opportunities for career advancement, and other work-life enhancements. We provide a supportive, varied, and positive work environment and offer competitive compensation packages. The Maryland Judiciary, the third branch of state government, is a premier employer that promotes a diverse workforce. Join more than 4,000 people across the state who are committed to ensuring access to justice, equity, fairness, and integrity in the judicial process. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |